In To the Barricades (ALB) will bring a lawsuit against Nihilo and against Wikipedia. View: this and this
Apparently, the reason for the anger is entry "Anarchism" in Wikipedia , which was written by Nihilo. Because people are managed and controlled ALB-most-anarcomunistas or members, it seems very bad that Wikipedia is made appear to market anarchism (and very especially the anarcho-capitalism) as an ideology, a trend or movement as important as anarcho-communism, anarcho-syndicalism and other collectivist anarchism. It also seems undesirable to say that market anarchism is closely related to individualist anarchism, or is a development of it, or-worse still-an "evolution" of it. As they say, market anarchism is something very minor, almost unknown, without history, without heroes, without a fight. At best it is something that exists on the internet and nothing else. It has no importance deserves cleverly-give-Nihilo and Wikipedia (whose owner, Wales, is an admirer of Ayn Rand and is, therefore, someone close to anarcho-capitalism). And since Wikipedia is now an educational tool for many people, fear ALB students or beginners are left with the impression that market anarchism is really important within the anarchist movement ... which is not true. Anarchism authentic, truly, is the Communist or collectivist or syndicalist, which has spilled blood -no bits or bytes, in the struggle.
Well it's true that market anarchism is far from having the historical significance of the anarcho-socialist. However, little by little is becoming important. In the U.S. a majority, or is in the process of being, may already have most anarcho-capitalists and anarcho anarcomutualistas that. Only in the Libertarian Party there may be three or four thousand supporters and activists of anarcho-capitalism. And what say the LP, despite being a minority party, draws attention in the press and among lawmakers, interest groups, the president's office, etc.. In Europe and Latin America there is no Libertarian Party, but it's hard to resist this influence comes from North America. In addition, the individualist tradition still lives there, in fact there are many anarchists who claim to be "individualistic" and are very critical of democracy. Nor is it difficult to begin to read more Mises and less to Marx, in Spain, for example, Red Liberal and Inst Juan de Mariana, both dominated by anarcho-have for some weight among the intellectuals, even those on the left. All that, almost certainly lead to many market individualist anarchism, the agora or some variety of anarcomutualismo that is almost-almost like anarcho-capitalism. Muchos terminarán convertidos en anarcocapitalistas de facto... aun cuando en el plano retórico se llamen a sí mismos “proudhonianos”, "socialistas" o algo parecido.
Por otro lado, la dicotomía colectivismo/individualismo sigue estando hoy tan vigente como en el siglo xix. Los anarquistas podrán diferenciarse entre sí por su forma de organizarse, claro que sí. Pero es inevitable que también se separen por sus principios filosóficos. Más tarde o más temprano salen a relucir las diferencias filosóficas. Y la principal, o una de las principales, es la de colectivistas/individualistas, o la de los que prefieren la planificación y la propiedad social y los que prefieren market and private property. Therefore it seems justified that the Wikipedia article makes the great distinction between "schools of anarchism." And then it is inevitable to talk about market anarchism, anarcho-capitalism, Molinari, Rothbard, etc..
Finally, the word "anarchism" is not anyone's private property. It does not belong to those of ALB or the anarchists of Spain. That last word has been used as synonymous with "anarcho" or "anarcho" nothing more than an accident. In the American tradition the word "anarchy" has always been tied to individualism, the market and some kind of "ownership or possession." That should be enough to understand that the duality collectivism / individualism is central to anarchism.
Trying to mediate this dispute-Nihilo vs ALB-I suggest the following:
A Nihilo: That Wikipedia article give more space or emphasis to the history of socialist anarchism and their struggles, concepts, values, strategies, Heroes / héroas, authors or authors. At ALB: To recognize that market anarchism is a trend that is growing within anarchism and also deserves some space or emphasis. The fact that liberals in it, the fact that the word "capitalism" is part of its name, that use other strategies, or the fact that the class struggle is not "workers vs. capitalists", but "civil society against the state", does not have to turn it into a pseudo-anarchism.
Finally, congratulate Nihilo not yield to the doctrinaire and insulting, and anarchism strive to present a neutral and objective.
And jokes, here is a good
And here's another
UPDATE
The scandal is bigger than I thought. Look
RE-UPDATE
individualist anarchism also has its traditions, its heroes and their struggles. View this
Anarcho-capitalism is simply one of the logically possible ways you can take individualist anarchism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment