THE RUSTIC SPORTS on land, not suitable
CITY OF ALMADEN DE LA PLATA
Expósito
Armando Cáceres, of age, resident of Almaden de la Plata home in El Crucero, number, 42, hereby STATES: That
BOP 4/2/2011 No 28 is subjected to public information ", the draft act for the construction of sports center on land owned by the applicant in Range 2, plot 67 of Almaden de la Plata. " On time and make the following allegations:
1 .- For the parcel to the project:
1.a) In The Land Registry, are two different references with different uses, one is 41009A002000670001YS Reference, and the other 41009A002000670000TA , the documentation on the record shows only 2 meetings, it is incomprehensible. (What is incomprehensible not to otherwise qualified) How can a registered parcel reference has two different uses?.
1.b) The file to which I had access, indicates a pre-contract price of sale of 360,000 Euros, ie more than 20,000,000 .- of the old pesetas / ha. I believe it is "exorbitant" (exorbitant say it does not use another term), the price is justified only in a technical report of the architect-mayor, who made the assessment. When it is logical that the assessment made out by an "Expert" Assessor ".
1.c) Both the report of the Municipal Building Surveyor, Architect and in the action project editor D. José Manuel Jimenez Gonzales, saying that this plot has a gentle slope, when the reality is that over 60% of the plot has a steep, difficult urban solution, unless large earthworks and terracing, which implies substantial expenses.
1.d) The proposed action is in the record, does not appear to be endorsed by the College of Architects.
1.e) The plot despite being fully paid, according to pre-contract is not registered in the Land Registry Cazalla de la Sierra on behalf of the City.
1.f) The site for the sports center is totally illogical, because its location would be in the "Huerta del Pilar" City property, along with the Colleges, so that profitability would be higher, since during the day could be used by students of the college and the rest of the time for all the uses listed in the draft performance.
In the beginning of the record date, there were lots available in the "Huerta del Pilar.
1.g) I would expect the performance and management project off the entire field, and as I have understood that this plot was intended (against common sense), to locate other services.
1.h) is not indicated in the PORN and PRUG, Sierra Norte de Sevilla, is qualified as Zone B, and in the vicinity of the Cave The Covachas. " Because of its location would have a major impact on the landscape.
2 .- The project did not indicate with clarity and precision performance, there are only sketches of the "Sports" in that plot.
3 .- The record there is no economic justification and financial.
4 .- In the record, indicates that there is a draft Implementing Basic and written by the architect D. Grajera Pedro Villalba, not included in it. Asked Mr. Secretary, said "this is what we have on file."
5 .- With regard to viability, states that "the City has intention to develop short-term PEOYECTOS OTHER IN THIS PLOT. " Not specified, or projects or economic and financial report. (Where's the money?).
6 .- The Draft Sports, do not specify:
Access, parking, sewage, water, electricity, etc. .. Therefore
concluded, the record is incomplete, in terms of performance, there is no clear definition of the actions to be in that plot, there is a total economic and financial evaluation. It does not conform to current legislation. So is not the place for such action. Almaden
silver to February 23, 2011.
0 comments:
Post a Comment